← Back to portfolio Reporting Automation Telegram Bot preview
Stack
Pythonaiogram / telegram-botSQLcron schedulerTableau
Impact
  • Cut weekly report prep from 1–2h to automated cron
  • KPI table + sparklines delivered on schedule
  • Fallback notifications on source failures
  • Single consolidated pipeline replacing fragmented sources

Reporting Automation Telegram Bot

Context

Every week an analyst manually gathered metrics from several sources, refreshed a dashboard, exported screenshots, and posted them to the team chat. The process took 1–2 hours, was often delayed, and depended on a single person. The task: automate report preparation and delivery.

Hypothesis

If we move weekly report assembly into a Telegram bot that fetches data, builds the message, and sends it on a schedule, the team saves analyst time and gets metrics regularly and in a consistent format.

Data & Method

Data: product metrics from a database (SQL), external APIs, and ready-made Tableau dashboards.

Bot architecture:

  1. Scheduler — cron-triggered at a set time.

  2. Data collection — SQL queries to the data mart, aggregation of key KPIs (DAU, ARPU, conversion, retention).

  3. Report assembly — a template with a KPI table, sparklines, and week-over-week comparison (delta in % and pp).

  4. Delivery — Telegram Bot API to a chat or via the /report command.

  5. Reliability — error handling, logging, fallback notifications on source failures (important: a silent-fall of the bot erodes trust in metrics faster than the time savings grow).

Tools: Python (aiogram/telegram-bot), SQL, cron, Tableau for visualization.

Findings

Manual report assembly turned out to be less complex than fragmented: metrics had to be pulled from different places. After consolidation into one pipeline, most of the work moved to the machine, and the analyst became responsible for interpretation rather than copying numbers.

Key insight: delivery stability matters more than report polish. If the bot fails silently, trust in metrics drops faster than the time savings grow — so fallback notifications on source failure are built into the architecture rather than added “later.”

Impact

  • Report prep time cut — manual 1–2h assembly replaced by automated cron.
  • Timely metric delivery — reports arrive on schedule regardless of analyst workload.
  • Team communication improved — everyone sees the same numbers (KPI + sparklines + delta) in one format and place.
  • Silent-fail protection — fallback notifications on source failures preserve trust in metrics.

Documentation

  • The repository is private — available on request. No public code; the card does not link an empty/stub repository.

Case study

Problem

The weekly report was assembled by hand: the analyst pulled metrics from several sources, refreshed a dashboard, exported screenshots and posted them to the team chat. It took 1–2 hours, often slipped, and depended on one person.

Approach

Moved report assembly into a Telegram bot: a cron scheduler, SQL queries against the mart, a template with a KPI table and sparklines, and a delta to the previous week. Reliability is built into the architecture — error handling, logging and fallback notifications when a source fails, because silent bot failures destroy trust in metrics faster than the time savings grow.

Result

Manual assembly of 1–2h is replaced by an automatic cron: metrics arrive on schedule in one format, the team sees the same numbers, and the analyst owns interpretation instead of copying. Fallback notifications keep trust in the metrics when sources fail.

1–2h → 0 Report time
on schedule Delivery
KPI + sparklines Format
fallback Silent-fail guard

See also

Connection map

Projects, posts and topics connected to this one. Hover a node to see its name; click to open.